{shortcode-3b1db777dc2efd1056da9b35c97136a0ad2495e2} Researchers at the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences have developed a microscopic material called a “metacorrector” that fixes chromatic aberrations in lenses — a revolutionary alternative to the bulky, expensive glass lenses used today, according to a study published in Nano Letters on Nov. 13.
Applied Physics Professor Federico Capasso, postdoctoral fellow Wei-Ting Chen, and graduate student Alexander Y. Zhu pioneered this technology, alongside other members of the Capasso Group and researchers at other institutions.
A single-material lens will focus different wavelengths of light to slightly different points, according to Chen. The discrepancy between the wavelengths’ focal points creates a blurry effect, known as a chromatic aberration. Since the 17th century, traditional lenses have remedied this problem by combining multiple glass materials. The image is no longer blurry, but the lenses themselves are heavier and more costly to manufacture.
“Without putting two glasses together, there is no way to compensate for chromatic aberrations, according to conventional wisdom,” Chen said.
The metacorrector presents an alternative to chunky lenses.
Chen and his collaborators defied centuries of convention by developing a “single layer nanostructure” that varies lens curvature in response to the specific wavelength of light hitting the lens. For example, the metacorrector functions as a convex lens for red light — meaning the lens is curved outward — and as a concave lens for blue light — meaning the lens is curved inward.
“If you have a lens, its curvature determines the function,” Chen said. “Here, it actually varies its function from concave lens to convex lens, depending on the incident wavelengths. That’s the key to overcoming chromatic aberrations in our design.”
Chen said the metacorrector has the potential to make any optical system more compact, from microscopes, to augmented and virtual reality devices, to cameras.
Visual Arts Professor Alfred Guzzetti ’64 said the idea of manipulating lens curvature on a nanoscale level is “pretty amazing.” He said he was especially fascinated by how the action of light hitting the lens could instruct the lens to behave in a particular way.
In particular, Guzzetti said the cost-effectiveness of the metacorrector would avoid the steep manufacturing costs of high-end lenses, which can cost upwards of $12,00, and make the technology more accessible to everyday consumers.
Visual and Environmental Studies Department Chair Robb Moss wrote in an email that the metacorrector — like other technological developments in film, such as zoom lenses and the ability to shoot in low light — will create opportunities for filmmakers to experiment and innovate.
“I am excited to see how these new lenses will see the world,” Moss wrote.
Harvard has protected the intellectual property concerning the metacorrector and is looking into the possibility of commercializing its technology, according to a SEAS press release published Nov. 19.
Correction: Dec. 3, 2018
A previous version of this article incorrectly indicated that Visual Arts Professor Alfred Guzzetti ’64 said high-end lenses can cost upwards of $1,200. In fact, the said he lenses can cost upwards of $12,000.
—Staff writer Amy L. Jia can be reached at amy.jia@thecrimson.com. Follow her on Twitter @AmyLJia.
—Staff writer Sanjana L. Narayanan can be reached at sanjana.narayanan@thecrimson.com.
Read more in Faculty News
Amid Allegations of Sexual Misconduct, Harvard Prof. Fryer Racks Up Second Prestigious AwardRecommended Articles
-
HARVARD OBSERVATORY MOVES TO SOUTH AFRICAOn March twenty-fourth over 70 cases of telescopes and accessories were shipped on the steamship "City of Athens" to East
-
A Senior's Serapbook Pictures at an ExhibitionThere they all were-the veritable image of geographical distribution-sitting in the Waldorf Cafeteria on Mass Ave, freshman roommates enjoying their
-
Considering the Myth of Violence in Music and Society
-
The Microscope, Part 1"Heated fights broke out in the scientific community over whether the new mechanical objectivity offered by photography could properly replace the trained judgment of the illustrator-observer."
-
Following 2017 Controversy Over Origins of the Universe, New Paper Offers Test for Cosmic Inflation