Jackson and Yang, for their part, argued that the Council needed to arrange a more streamlined process for student groups to receive funding.
Others disagreed with those ideas.
{shortcode-f5516e749bc5e00725ff5c5f655465b910ffb0a3}
Heine said the funding process already was efficient and called Goyal and Nasrollahzadeh’s idea of soliciting alumni donations “presumptuous.”
Horvath presented a simple solution for the UC to more adequately address student needs: “shut up and listen.”
Advertisement
—Staff writer Noah J. Delwiche can be reached at noah.delwiche@thecrimson.com. Follow him on Twitter @ndelwiche.