Regardless of whether or not Justin G. Fong's "The Invasian" (Magazine, March 15) was seen as offensive, your organization's failure to stand by the publishing of an individual's opinion undermines your reputation ("To Our Readers," March 20). Since the article was a personal account, it in no way reflected your official views, and while Fong's statements may have been offensive, that does not by any means deem them inappropriate for publication.

By bowing to the pressure of those who were offended by the article, you have cheapened The Crimson's reputation and credibility for reporting issues whether or not they are controversial. While I in no way condone Fong's sentiments, I believe that they have a right to be heard. Any publication that attempts to fully serve a community should not shy away from controversial issues.

Nicholas B. Hobbs '02

March 20, 2001

•

Apology Was Correct

To the editors:

I commend the Crimson for its apology in regard to Justin G. Fong's article. "The Invasian" was not responsible journalism, but The Crimson has shown itself to be a responsible institution in apologizing. The Crimson did not apologize for offending readers. Instead, it apologized for publishing a piece that did not adhere to its standards.