This is just another example of why freedom and tolerance are preferable to censorship and narrow-minded refusal to consider all sides of an important controversy such as reparations for slavery.
Congratulations for a principled stand, but also for your brilliant strategy in upholding the dignity and professionalism of The Crimson. Horowitz has embarassed a number of campus papers that were afraid to publish his controversial views or that capitulated to mob rule by apologizing for having run the ad. The Crimson should be proud of its decision.
Harvey A. Silverglate
Boston, Mass.
March 21, 2001
Don't Apologize For Fong
Read more in Opinion
Keeping Quiet on Social SecurityRecommended Articles
-
To Print Or Not To Print: Ad Kindles OutrageLast Wednesday, on the last day of Black History Month, the UC-Berkeley Daily Californian published an advertisement titled "Ten Reasons
-
Assaulting Free SpeechThis Wednesday will mark the two-week anniversary of an assault against freedom of speech. On Feb. 28, the UC-Berkeley Daily
-
LettersStyle of 'The Invasian' Needlessly Offensive To the editors: I will not completely disagree with Justin G. Fong's opinions (Magazine,
-
Horowitz Addresses Overflowing CrowdDavid Horowitz spoke to a packed auditorium at Boston University (BU) last night in an address entitled “Racism & the
-
Horowitz Denies Need for Slave Reparatioins At MIT DebateDavid Horowitz continued his crusade against slavery reparations for African-Americans in a debate at MIT last night against Dorothy Lewis,
-
Horowitz Promotes Right-Wing Ideals At Local Conference For ConservativesCampus Republicans had the chance on Saturday afternoon, to chat with David L. Horowitz, the man in the middle of