"It has become a sort of big divide," says Stanley Hoffmann, who has taught at Harvard for 45 years and--like many who favor the historical or institutional approach--may soon retire.
"Rational choice leaves out what makes politics interesting: passions," Hoffmann says.
But rational choice proponent Kenneth Shepsle, who recently ended his term as chair of Harvard's department, says his methodology is attacked simply because it is straightforward in stating its assumptions about human motivation so strongly.
"Others put much less of a premium on putting their premises on the table in a clear fashion," Shepsle says. "It's hard to punch a marshmallow."
Traditionalists admit that rational choice has a place in political science, noting that it has worked well in some predictions about how American government works.
Rational choice, for example, showed that those who would be affected by government regulations would be the only parties likely to try to influence the legislation. And so, counter-intuitively, such regulations often help rather than hinder the industries they are intended to control.
Successes notwithstanding, many of the names that made the Harvard department famous, as well as outside observers, decry rational choice.
The New Republic cites, for example, the method's famous inability to account for why any modern Americans would actually bother to vote, since logic would tell them their vote has no impact and doesn't benefit them.
Read more in News
Mayor Advocates Wage IncreaseRecommended Articles
-
A ROTC SolutionFor an institution which prides itself on being the premier educational institution in the world and one that values toleration,
-
Citizens' Apathy FrighteningTo the editors: The reactions to the impeachment process expressed by Erin Ashwell (Letters, Dec. 14) and The Crimson's editorial
-
Let's Be Sane About This DebateThis evening I had the opportunity to peruse the latest Peninsula issue. I say opportunity because at an institution which
-
SHOCKLEY'S RIGHTSTo the Editors of The Crimson: "Freedom of speech" cannot be invoked to defend William Shockley against those who forced
-
Dissent DecorouslyF ace it--General Colin Powell is going to speak at Harvard's 357th Commencement whether you like it or not. The
-
The Art of Making People ThinkA ssuming the role of Emily Post for campus discourse, Evan P. Cucci advanced his view of what constitutes responsible