Advertisement

Union Organizing Efforts

National Endorsement Spells Relief

The heightened awareness has paid off in increased support for HUCTW. In March, about a month after the affiliation with AFSCME, union leaders said almost 400 new supporters had signed on to support the union.

Union leaders have said in the past that they will call for an election when they garner the support of a majority of workers in each of 22 organizing areas on campus and when the organizing commttee is built up to 600. Officials have predicted a late fall election.

One worker, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, says that just in the last three months "people who support the union, have all started coming out of the woodwork."

This staff member attributed the heightened support to the organizers' constant contact with employees. "They persisted week after week, and after a while we said, 'What's the story, tell me about it."'

Leslie Sullivan, who founded the independent organizing drive in the Medical Area that has grown into HUCTW, says since she left the effort in 1981 there has been an increase in one-to-one outreach efforts. Now there is an organizing committee in each of the 22 organizing areas across campus and "a real understanding on the part of the workers what the union is," she says.

Advertisement

Charles Heckscher, assistant professor at the Business School and specialist in labor, says "each organizing area has strong leadership and support."

Labor experts say that the HUCTW drive is a symbol for heightened efforts nationwide to organize white collar workers, especially in universities and service industries.

"The Harvard debate is on the cutting edge of post-industrial life, how we decide to organize ourselves," says Ralph Whitehead, a public service professor at the University of Massachusetts.

"The HUCTW campaign is very symbolic for the labor movement because Harvard is a decentralized work place, heavily populated by white collar and service workers, a lot of autonomy in the workplace and not necessarily much respect," says Heckscher."

Last month HUCTW accomplished a feat that has stumped the other unions at the University--drawing together all seven Harvard unions into a coalition, to work together and show solidarity in the case of a strike. Union experts see this unprecedented move as a testament to HUCTW's successful organizing strategies.

"Unions don't work well together, normally they aren't compatible," says Heckscher. "For this to happen is quite impossible and a very positive sign."

But despite the union's recent victories, it still faces some major obstacles. The support staff undergoes a tremendously high turnover rate, about 25 percent a year, and most staff leave in the summer.

While HUCTW will no doubt lose some of itssupporters from this departing group, Rondeau isoptimistic about the prospects for winning overthe newly hired staff and for retaining adisproportionate share of union supporters, whowill choose to stay at Harvard for the election.

Over the summer HUCTW plans to organize fasterthan the turnover, Rondeau says. HUCTW will expandits group of full-time organizers, from 10 to 16.

The main block to the organizing drive could bethe anti-union efforts of the administration.During past election drives in the Medical Area,the University ran a "viscious anti-unioncampaign," Sullivan says. Employees were"inundated" with anti-union material and invitedto meetings with Harvard's top administrators,which "created an atmosphere of tension andanxiety."

This fall the University will voice itsopposition to the union effort, as it has for 15years, by talking to supervisors and trying tobring the administration's position to workers,Cantor says.

Last month HUCTW sent a letter to allsupervisors and administrators requestingneutrality. Cantor says the University will"absolutely not" abide by HUCTW's request forneutrality.

"The union can say whatever they wish," Cantorsays. "That's not neutrality. Neutrality isreached when both sides state their case and theelectorate considers all the facts and reaches adecision."

Harvard has responsed to increased unionactivity with some bureacratic maneuvering. Theveteran of several union battles, Vice Presidentand General Counsel Daniel Steiner '54,relinquished his labor duties which have now beenpicked up by Vice President for AdministrationRobert Scott.

University officials say the change marks nopolicy shift, but Rondeau contends that Steiner,who has been victorious in his anti-union effortsin the past, may be "getting out now, while thegettin's good.

Recommended Articles

Advertisement