An HMS paper published this December in the Journal of Medical Ethics does a risk-benefit assessment of booster mandates, ultimately concluding that the mandates may have been misguided. Contrary to the intentions of the authors, the data now serves as material for conservative medical organizations like AFLDS skeptical of Covid-19 vaccine efficacy.
Vaccine Booster Argument
By Michael Hu
Related Articles
MOST READ
-
Harvard Salient’s Board of Directors Suspends Publication, Citing ‘Reprehensible’ Material in Articles
-
Harvard FAS Cuts Ph.D. Seats By More Than Half Across Next Two Admissions Cycles
-
The Bandaids on a Pedagogical Bullet Hole
-
Harvard Dental Center Permanently Closes Cambridge Clinic, Citing Financial Strain
-
Removal of Harvard PSC’s ‘Wall of Resistance’ Sparks Confrontation Between Larry Summers, College Officials