{shortcode-6f788208b5de7950816e75ff9d9e516880344e63}Race-related activism is re-emerging at Harvard Law School after a group of Law students wore pink armbands and hung posters last month to “stand in solidarity with people of color” following incidents of racism at Stanford Law School in the fall.

The events at Stanford included recruitment letters posted by a white supremacist group and the placement of anti-immigrant mail in a student’s mailbox.

First-year Law student Felipe D. Hernandez, along with 11 other students who chose to remain anonymous, wrote a Feb. 2018 letter published in the Harvard Law Record arguing the Law School also struggles with racism. A photo of Law Students holding a sign spelling out “#RacismLivesHereToo” accompanied the letter.

Hernandez said his co-authors, who he said were mostly first-year Law students, wished to remain anonymous in order to preserve their relationships with administrators.

“People are organizing different things on campus and so they are still developing their relationships with the admin so we’re always careful about releasing anyone’s name tied to any particular event or organizing because that’s how institutions of power have traditionally used that method to identify activists and activism,” Hernandez said.

The group also put up posters around the Law School’s campus, highlighting instances of prejudice they said they had encountered at the school and calling out “‘-isms’ of subordination on campus.” The posters include statements like “My name is continually mispronounced despite correcting people multiple times” and “Classmates have said ‘your English is so good I didn’t know you are an international student.’”

While the campaign was not officially organized by any formal affinity groups, president of the Harvard Black Law Students Association Jazzmin A. Carr praised it in an emailed statement, writing her group “stands in solidarity” with its organizers.

“Our organization remains firmly committed to charging our administration and the greater society to confront the racism, prejudice, discrimination, profiling, victimization, objectification, micro-aggressions, and marginalization that members of our community often face,” she wrote. “This campaign reflects that mission and has emboldened members of our community to speak out and to act. We thank all the organizers and students who bravely shared their experiences, and we will continue to advocate alongside them.”

The Harvard Law Record letter specifically criticized the structure of the financial aid system, the perception that the school is not geared toward public interest, and the first-year curriculum.

Law School Dean of Students Marcia L. Sells emphasized the school takes these issues seriously and is working to improve the school’s culture and offerings.

“The student financial services office advisory group is looking at the Loan Income Protection Plan. LIPP is something that is always being looked at,” Sells said in an interview last week, addressing criticisms of the school’s financial aid and public interest programs.

LIPP is a program designed to help Law graduates who enter into public service careers pay back their student loans. Students in the LIPP program pay back a portion of their loans based on their income and LIPP covers the remaining amount. In recent years, Law School affiliates have debated the efficacy of the program and the perception that the Law School pushes students toward corporate law.

Sells also mentioned the school has created 1L reading groups, discussion circles, improved faculty advising, and set aside time for open office hours with the deputy deans.

Sells suggested that the majority of the students involved in the “Racism Lives Here Too” actions are first-year students and may not have been exposed to all of the resources the Law School provides, particularly those geared towards promoting public interest.

“As a first-year student—and this is a student who just finished first semester—there are some things that we aren’t doing in terms of public interest advising right away because it is also about for first-years to study and feel at ease,” Sells said. “There’s lots of opportunities.”

Race-related issues are not new to Harvard Law School; two years ago, the school saw a wave of activism after an incident in which black tape was placed over the portraits of black law professors. Reclaim Harvard Law—the activist movement that emerged in the wake of the incident—occupied a student lounge for weeks, calling on administrators to create a more welcoming environment for minority students and faculty.

The school made took several steps in the spring of 2016 to address concerns about diversity and inclusivity on its campus, including removing the Law School’s seal, which bore the crest of a slave-owning family.

The Reclaim movement died down by fall 2016, but students and administrators say they are still thinking about diversity and inclusion at the Law School.

“Universities, I think, higher ed, are looking at the issues of belong, inclusion, at large and Harvard University and Harvard Law School is no different,” Sells said. “It did not just begin just this year, I think it’s, for most of them around diversity it’s been an ongoing thing probably for a number of years but from the time that I have been here on campus it’s been work. We’ve been working since I arrived.”

—Staff writer Aidan F. Ryan can be reached at aidan.ryan@thecrimson.com. Follow him on Twitter @AidanRyanNH.