The University has had a heavy hand in funding the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps at MIT through a legally separate entity called the Friends of Harvard ROTC Trust, though Harvard has not officially recognized or funded the program since the early 1990s, according to alumni and members of the Advocates for Harvard ROTC.
While Harvard has not publicly supported the Trust, alumni say that the Harvard Alumni Affairs & Development office and individuals at Harvard originally helped to create the Trust and have assisted in coordinating significant donations since.
Additionally, donations given to the Trust are counted as a gift to the University, “as if they had given to Harvard,” said Michael Segal ’76, a member of the Advocates for Harvard ROTC.
The Trust was created under the auspices of Boston law firm Choate Hall & Stewart to shoulder the overhead costs of ROTC at MIT, where Harvard students participating in ROTC currently train. Its creation followed a Faculty Council vote in 1994 that prohibited Harvard from paying for costs associated with the program while “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”—the military policy that banned gays and lesbians from openly serving in the military—was in place.
Following the December repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” University President Drew G. Faust signed an agreement with the Navy to recognize ROTC last month.
The repeal will not be implemented until it goes through a certification process that is slated to conclude later this year.
According to the Trust’s most recent tax filing, in fiscal year 2009 the Trust paid MIT $136,344.
“Harvard was definitely involved,” Segal said. “The Harvard alumni people were involved and they helped in facilitating of the setting up of this fund.”
Two or three prominent alumni have donated to the Trust, covering the yearly costs which range from about $130,000 to $160,000, depending on the number of students enrolled in the ROTC program.
“The Trust is just a vehicle for handling the money to ensure that MIT gets its fair share allocation,” said Chairman of Advocates for Harvard ROTC Capt. Paul E. Mawn USNR (Ret.) ’63.
Though Harvard has not been directly involved, Mawn said, the “whole thing was a wink-and-a-nod process.”
Segal said that Harvard may have felt compelled to offer institutional support to the Trust because the University has continued to accept scholarships awarded to ROTC participants by the federal government.
The money associated with the program “sort of flows in and out,” Segal said.
In 2002, then-University President Lawrence H. Summers told students he felt the funding arrangement for ROTC was “unorthodox” and “uncomfortable.”
The alumni who have donated to the Trust have remained anonymous to many members of the Advocates for Harvard ROTC, said Warren M. Schur ’69.
Recommended Articles
-
Draw Down the Trust FundThe strain on the Social Security system is not destined to increase forever.
-
Shaken TrustThe email searches raise issues far beyond questionable email search policies and failed communication. It cuts to the core of what trust and community means at Harvard
-
In Wake of Email Scandal, Professors Mourn Loss of TrustFour days after news broke that Harvard administrators secretly searched the email accounts of 16 resident deans last September, professors called on administrators to address what one called a corroding of a “culture of trust” between the faculty and its leaders.
-
Text of Letter from 32 Members of the History Department to FAS Dean SmithRead the text of a March 14 letter that was sent by 32 members of the History Department to Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Michael D. Smith. The letter, which was authored by history professor Lisa M. McGirr, calls on Harvard to “repair the breach of trust in our community” caused by administrators' secret search of the email accounts of 16 resident deans last September.
-
To Rebuild Trust, Hammonds Must ResignSince Hammonds provided misinformation regarding the highly sensitive issue of email searches, and since she violated clear policy regarding those searches, her presence at the helm of the College stands as a roadblock to rebuilding trust between students, faculty, and the administration. For the good of the University, Hammonds must resign.
-
A Call for HonestyWe are pleased to see that Hammonds is vacating her position, and we hope that this move will aid the Harvard community in beginning the process of reestablishing trust among students, faculty, and administrators.