Columnist and political pundit Christopher Hitchens championed war with Iraq in a heated debate with former Divinity School Dean J. Bryan Hehir last night at the Kennedy School of Government’s Forum.

Hitchens, introduced by Institute of Politics Director Daniel R. Glickman as a “renowned contrarian,” suggested that U.S. military intervention was a moral necessity in a discussion initiated to answer the question, “Would War Be Just?”

“If you don’t act prudently now, you will have to act—not prudently or imprudently, but simply act—for your own self-preservation,” Hitchens said.

Maintaining an opposing viewpoint, Hehir invoked the “just war theory,” first suggested by St. Augustine, to contend that war with Iraq would be immoral.

“War is moral only when it is absolutely necessary,” said Hehir, who currently serves as the president and CEO of Catholic Charities USA. “I think the case has not yet been made for necessity.”

Hitchens requested that the discussion begin with an audience vote. The majority of the 500 audience members present voted that war would not be just; equal minorities favored intervention or were undecided.

“You’ve got your work cut out for you,” Glickman joked to Hitchens.

He repeated the audience poll when the discussion ended. A few audience members indicated that they had changed their opinions, but results remained essentially the same.

The stances Hitchens and Hehir held last night are not ones they have consistently adopted. Hehir endorsed the Gulf War while Hitchens opposed it. Hehir also supported intervention in Afghanistan earlier this year.

Hehir nonetheless maintained that the United States should consider war only as a final resort.

“Great power in the world is as much about restraint as it is about coercion,” he said.

“We can be seduced by arguments that war is easy, that war is a unique catalyst of change,” he said.

Hehir reiterated that he has not seen compelling evidence for Iraqi intervention.

“Necessity has not been proven, and because it has not been proven I am not prepared to endorse a stance of moral legitimation over Iraq,” he said.

But Hitchens argued that ample evidence of future Iraqi weapons threats existed.