The Lowell House bells, whose tones resound for a quarter-hour each Sunday morning, may be claimed by an echo of their Russian past.

The bells came from the St. Danilov Monastery in Moscow, where officials miss their distinct sounds and are calling for their return after 72 years of Harvard possession. They’ve set a return deadline—March 2003 at the latest, the 700th anniversary of St. Danilov’s death.

“The bells are beautiful. You can see why they consider them an important part of Russian history,” said Lowell House Master Diana L. Eck. “If it was a practical matter to remove them, it would be a good thing to do, but there are many issues involved.”

Lowell House representatives and officials from the University President’s office have been discussing the question of returning the bells, but Eck said they were “highly unlikely” to reach a decision before March. The decision, she said, would come from higher University administrators.

“This is no small feat,” she said. “It would be both time consuming and expensive, requiring substantial fundraising that is not in anyone’s budget right now.”

According to William H. Bossert ’59, Arnold professor of science and a former Lowell master, removing the bells from their perch in the Lowell tower would cost tens of millions of dollars and require more than a summer’s worth of renovations. “They presumably will pay for it,” he said. “Money could be raised and wouldn’t be the basis of the decision.”

“Lowell would have to be closed for at least one semester, and a housing crisis would be too much of a problem,” he added.

But Eck said officials would need to conduct a structural engineering study and at the moment are “really not sure how it would impact housing.”

The bells, which were originally crafted for the monastery in the 17th and 18th centuries, were purchased from St. Danilov’s in the 1920s by industrialist Charles Crane when the Russian government threatened to melt them.

Crane, a Harvard graduate, then presented the 18 bells to University President A. Lawrence Lowell as a gift in 1930, the year that Lowell House was being built as part of the president’s new residential plan for the College.

Resident tutor Luis A. Campos ’99, a former House bell ringer, said the bells are physically beautiful, including “inscriptions, carvings and a beautiful green patina.”

“Any cultural artifact that has significance for two groups will create this kind of issue,” he said.

The bells have been rung almost constantly since the House was built and became such an important part of the House that in the 1950s students founded the Lowell House Society of Russian Bell Ringers, which still exists.

Although St. Danilov’s bell tower is not empty today and contains substitute bells, Father Roman Ugrinko, the current ringer, told the Moscow Times that “the bells have a weak sound, and they don’t play well together because they come from different churches. But to ring the original bells—that would be a pleasure.”

This attempt to regain the bells is not the monastery’s first. When Bossert was master of Lowell in the late 1980s, the Archbishop of Moscow requested that Harvard return the bells.