"In terms of coalition building, I think this is an important step," said Eddie A. Bruce '02.
But Bruce and some other speakers also seemed intent on venting frustration with the article itself, and with Crimson staff.
"This was not just irresponsible journalism but not journalism at all," Bruce said. "It was totally not constructive."
Others were more explicit in their criticism.
"I am pissed," said Jeff Sheng '02. "I cannot believe that even one person in this building [The Crimson] could go to The New York Times and say, 'Look at this piece of journalism that was in my school newspaper.'"
Some speakers, meanwhile, focused on the larger context of Fong's article.
Margaret C. Anadu '03 said she felt The Crimson's decision to run Fong's piece was only part of the problem being highlighted by yesterday's protest.
Read more in News
HBS Profs Say Bush's 'CEO in Chief' Title MisleadingRecommended Articles
-
Kunes Receives Tenure in BiologyLoeb Professor of the Natural Sciences Samuel L. Kunes, an expert in the field of vision and the brain, accepted
-
Students Meet to Discuss Potential Ethnic Studies ProgramAn open discussion of Ethnic Studies was held last night at Leverett dining hall, with about 15 students in attendance.
-
Berryline: New location, new name?Berryline, a favorite among Harvard Square treats (and the alternative food source of many an undergrad), might not go by
-
Innovation Summit Encourages Social Entrepreneurship -
Four UC Tickets Vie for Space on Ballot, Two Penalized Thus FarUndergraduate Council elections have kicked off amid some confusion about rules for soliciting petition signatures via Facebook.
-
Thanksgiving, Steve Ballmer, and 'U': UC Campaign Ad Gems
