Advertisement

Stymied By Secrecy

For thirteen months the University remained silent on the issue of a living wage, spurring the Progressive Student Labor Movement to action. Now administrators have announced their plans to aid workers. But students say it's not enough.

But committee members say they could not make their deliberations public for fear of disclosing incomplete or inaccurate recommendations.

"The feeling was that you didn't want to dribble it out because each piece wouldn't look as robust," Zeckhauser says. "Up until the last meeting there was disagreement. We didn't want to put things out half-baked."

Advertisement

But McKean says 13 months represents far too long a time for a committee to study employment practices at Harvard.

"I don't think that it takes empirical research to see that people who work for Harvard need enough money to live," McKean says. "This isn't an issue that can wait 13 months--there are people living in poverty right now."

Two Thumbs Down

PSLM members offer pointed and often vociferous critiques of the report--setting themselves in opposition to the committee and the administration.

"I thought the report was completely inadequate to address the issue of poverty on campus," Offner says.

Students say the committee's greatest failing was to dismiss a wage boost outright.

Recommended Articles

Advertisement