Starr said the independent counsel statute, which Congress enacted in 1978 following the turmoil of Watergate, was bad government.
"It was a well-intention but illusory effort to eradicate politics or the appearance of politics from the administration of Justice," he said.
Starr avoided direct criticism of Janet Reno's Justice Department, with the exception of one story during the question-and-answer period.
On Feb. 9, 1998, Starr's office was accused by Clinton lawyer David Kendall of leaking grand jury testimony to the media.
Starr said that as soon as he was made aware of the allegations, he called the FBI and spoke with assistant director Neil Gallagher.
Starr said he asked that FBI agents investigate his own office.
But, he said, "the Justice Department forbade the FBI from providing that assistance."
Starr denied that he or his prosecutors leaked grand jury testimony, which would have been illegal under federal law. He said that Clinton's lawyers had shared that information with the media.
Read more in News
The Greening of the CrimsonRecommended Articles
-
Aide Defends Clinton at ARCOSidney Blumenthal, assistant to President Clinton, blasted independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr while highlighting the accomplishments of the Clinton administration
-
Revise the Law: The independent counsel statue needs specificity and restraintsFive years ago this August, several weeks after Congress had extended the independent counsel law for another five years, a
-
The Potting ShedEver since the publication of his first novel in 1929, Graham Greene has been a master of the psychological thriller.
-
One Harvard Student's Attempt To Make A DifferenceLast spring, Andrew T. Starr '91-93 saw the obstreperous face of Bart Simpson in a place it didn't belong. And
-
Stop the MadnessThis past Thursday, Independent Prosecutor Kenneth W. Starr spent 12 hours testifying before the House Judiciary Committee. After a lengthy
-
Chasing Clinton, Stretching The LawT he questionable law enforcement techniques being employed by Kenneth Starr against President Clinton should be a cause of concern
