Advertisement

In some fields, advising languishes

Departments, College officers disagree on blame

Advice on Advising

In January 1999, the Faculty of Arts and Sciences' Committee on Advising and Counseling published a report on the status of advising in the College. The report aimed to "spur deficient departments to reflect on their sins" and learn from the more successful concentrations.

Faculty analysts compared the results of the 1997 and 1999 senior surveys, in which departing students were asked, among other things, to assess the quality of their department's advising.

Advertisement

The results varied greatly between concentrations, but in general, the high scorers tended to be the committees for degrees (which use Faculty from departments) and the smallest departments (which can hire their own Faculty).

Humanities departments received higher rankings. The hard sciences ranked in the middle, and social sciences like economics ranked near the bottom.

The Hist and Lit Example

History and literature is the largest concentration that has consistently ranked well in the senior survey questions on advising.

Besides the low student-to-faculty ratio in the honors-only concentration, juniors and seniors have one-on-one tutorials.

Recommended Articles

Advertisement