"Both Gore and Bush seem pragmatic and not dogmatic in their approaches to life and politics," Linsky wrote. "I assume that whoever is elected would govern from the middle and compromise to make progress."
The Numbers Game
Both parties are gunning to be the majority party in the Senate, and as the majority party the Republicans obviously have the most to lose.
Beyond the voting supremacy of a Senate majority, there are other crucial factors. The majority controls the committee chairs, giving it a powerful say on what bills make it to the floor, and controls presidential appointment confirmation hearings.
"A President Bush will not be able to slam right wing ideological judges down the throat of a closely-divided Senate," Linsky wrote.
Currently, the GOP has a 54-46 majority in the Senate, but this majority rests on tenuous ground. Under any scenario, the Democrats need a net gain of five seats to take control of the Senate.
If Gore were elected, the Democrats would have control of an evenly-divided Senate, but to get to 50-50 (apparently a net gain of four seats) the Democrats would actually need to win an extra seat because Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman's (D-Conn.) replacement would be chosen by Connecticut's Republican governor.
Read more in News
Florida Election Enters CourtroomRecommended Articles
-
DebateHeather A. Woodruff '03 was paying close attention to what Al Gore '69 was saying at the second presidential debate
-
Abortion Stance Hurts DemsIf you log on to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) web site, you will find links to dozens of interest
-
The State of the FilibusterBy all accounts, the 2004 election cycle was a disaster for Senate Democrats, who lost four seats to their Republican
-
Limping Towards VictoryThe Democrats need to recognize what an immense waste the Lamont-Lieberman race was for the party. You’ve got to hand
-
Five Harvard Grads Running for Senate in 2016