Advertisement

On Electoral College, Harvard Is Divided

"The electoral system seems to have worked in the past. At times like now there seem to be problems with it, but it helps certain smaller states get represented and protects minority rights," Jonathan H. Hatch '02 said.

But others contend that the electoral system actually does not protect states' rights at all.

"Candidates already spend most of their time in more populated areas and only campaign in smaller states through media, like advertisements. I don't think the system protects states' rights anymore," Heifeitz said.

Advertisement

"The system localizes election problems instead of making the election a national phenomenon," he added. "A mishap in one county in Florida shouldn't throw the entire election."

In addition, Heifeitz said the system reflects badly on American democracy and the voting process.

"America is supposed to be 'a light unto the nations,'" he said. "We play that role for emerging democracies, but reducing the outcome of the election to a few counties in Florida doesn't make sense. The Electoral College teaches people who live in small states that their votes don't really matter, that it's only the states with more electoral votes that matter."

For some, the issue is clear.

"I definitely think it should be abolished. By virtue of the fact that this crisis has occurred is reason enough to question the system," Amanda L. Burnham '01 said.

Recommended Articles

Advertisement