The Environment

Make no doubt about it, when it comes to environment, Gore has the clear edge. The author of the 1992 manifesto Earth in the Balance is an avid supporter of the Kyoto protocol--a 1997 commitment signed by over 100 countries to stem global emissions of greenhouse gases. By contrast, Bush's home state of Texas has the dubious distinction of having one of the worst environmental records in the nation. Gore has vowed to protect the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from oil exploration and is committed to saving the everglades. Bush, by contrast, has presented unconvincing proposals that would give private industries limited incentives to clean up their act.

So far, Gore has played an important role in formulating an international response to the threat of global climate change. A recent report by the U.N.-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has concluded that greenhouse gases are warming the world beyond our previous predictions. Whereas Bush played down this threat during the debates, Gore recognizes the urgency and can provide the leadership necessary for an international agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Picking Our Next Leader

Many students are weighing the choice between Gore and Green Party candidate Ralph Nader, including some who hope to cast a "tactical vote," if Gore seems far enough ahead in their state. Given the unreliability of poll numbers and the vagaries of voter turnout, we warn students from casting this kind of electoral protest. Not only does it seem clear that the Nader's potential votes may sway the election in a number of key states, but it is far better to vote for a major candidate than to support the pipe dream of an empowered Green party four years from now.