Vouchers Are Not the Answer
To the editors:
Vasant M. Kamath claims (Op-ed, April 27) that vouchers for private schools would "alleviate the crisis in American public education." Nothing is farther from the truth. Vouchers give government money to parents so that they can send their children to private or parochial schools. Advocates of the voucher system say allowing parents of poorer children to choose private schools will cause all schools to compete in a market system and will produce a more effective and efficient educational system.
However, research shows that voucher systems in Cleveland and Milwaukee were not effective. Cleveland voucher students did markedly worse than their public-school counterparts on standard tests. Mark Peterson's studies used to support alleged gains by voucher students have been criticized for serious sampling errors and unfair comparisons.
Free market efficiency comparisons between vouchers and public schools are not valid. Since public schools must provide education for all students, they have special burdens (costs in free market terminology) that private schools do not bear. For the voucher market to be truly competitive, the government would have to pay subsidies to public schools for the special social burden they alone must bear, and provide lead time to make use of this subsidy.
Another cost that public but not private schools are required to bear is the special standards they must meet for hiring teachers, testing students, choosing curricula and public reporting. Giving public money to a private school provides a blank check for instilling any values in that school that its patrons want, even those we as a community would reject. Due to our communal social discourse about the public school system, schools have been able to promote racial and social integration. Vouchers may lead to increased self-segregation.
Finally, rather than providing an incentive for public schools to improve, vouchers would take needed money and political support away from this system. Indeed, despite the rhetoric, the true goal for most advocates of vouchers is not to help public education but to transfer public money to church and suburban schools that serve the better-off white middle class.
Read more in Opinion
Reading Period WoesRecommended Articles
-
Study Links Test Scores With School ConditionsIn a new twist to the nature-versus-nature debate raging in the academic and popular literature, two professors have published a
-
Giving Kids the Options They NeedIn 1982, a released report shocked the nation. The National Commission on Excellence in Education found that "the educational foundations
-
Publicly Funded Parochial Schools?One nation under God? As apathy and low moral confidence spread, Americans are increasingly advocating a publicly funded return to
-
NPR Panelists Discuss School Vouchers at GSEPanelists for National Public Radio (NPR) debated the usefulness of private school vouchers before an audience of 200 in Gutman
-
Vouchers Are Not the AnswerTo the editors: Vasant M. Kamath claims (Op-ed, April 27) that vouchers for private schools would "alleviate the crisis in
-
A Lesson in LibertyD own but not out, educational voucher propositions live on. The disheartening defeat of California's voucher initiative, Proposition 174, on