Still, Bush's system has its converts even among liberals. And his striking success makes parents and students wonder if perhaps all the bubble-filling is perhaps making a difference. As further credit to the system, Texas' funding for education still remains below average, ranking 40th in spending among the 50 states. This means that it isn't the famous Democratic solution--spending--that has increased the scores of Texas students.

And where do the Democrats stand? It's hard to tell. Gore, while promoting the same pre-kindergarten programs as Bush does, remains hazy on teacher evaluations. Gore has said teachers should be reevaluated every five years, yet has gained the endorsement of the American Federation of Teachers by portraying Republicans as callous to the stress and demand of the teaching profession. And there seems to be little mention of student testing among all the talk of "values" and "discipline."

Bradley is hardly faring any better. With his sweeping medical mandates you would think Bradley would be come equally as clear on the other big issue on the collective American agenda. But when asked in the recent town hall debate in New Hampshire why voters should choose him, Bradley cited his views on health care, race relations, child poverty, campaign finance reform and economic growth, not education.

Both Democrats and Republicans still have plenty of time to address this vital issue before the final votes are cast next November. But as it stands now Bush has thrown down the gauntlet and the Democrats will have to address the debate on his terms. Will the public be treated to a substantial debate on the merits of testing and funding based on performance as well as other contentious issues such as the use of vouchers and charter schools?

Students may not be in favor of increased funding for the Educational Testing Services when there's barely enough money to pay for basics like books and papers. But the issue deserves more than lip-service. One year from now Americans should be able to vote for the candidate with the best educational policy after hearing the merits of all. Let's hope that both sides are up to the challenge.

Meredith B. Osborn '02, a Crimson editor, is a social studies concentrator in Leverett House.