But Mullin produced a November 18, 1986 memo from an accountant at Eric Management, which managed the property, showing that the project was losing $26,000 a month and had shown a net loss of $216,000.

"Is this desperate?" Mullin asked.

"NO, its a matter of getting people to do their jobs," Walsh responded.

And by introducing Walsh's 1986 income tax return, Mullin tried to impugn Walsh's earlier testimony. Specifically, Mullin suggested the income report on the tax return contradicted Walsh's claim that Schwartz left him with only 10-15 percent of all the firm's income for which she was responsible.

The prosecutor also noted that while Walsh's tax return said neither he nor any of his family members used any of the property listed on his form, Walsh's mother lived in one such property at 28 Hurlbut St.

"Is that a false statement on your tax return?" Mullin asked

"I don't understand how it got there," Walsh said.

Testimony ended yesterday, with closing arguments set for Monday.