ALTHOUGH OPINION is far from unanimous at the Education School, most professors interviewed seemed inclined to support Clinton given the present alternatives.

And some scholars said that as far as education issues are concerned, Clinton would be the clear favorite.

"His background of knowledge in education is unmatched," says Murphy, a former associate dean at the graduate school.

"One would expect an understanding of schools from him," adds Levine.

Professor of Education Gary Orfield, whose research has focused on education opportunities for minorities, says education is an "important secondary issue" and playing an increasingly more important role in the Clinton campaign.

Orfield also says that the candidate's wife, Hilary Clinton, is a plus. She is currently the general counsel for the Children's Defense Fund.

Scholars interviewed were also disappointed with President Bush's performance as the self-proclaimed "Education President."

Levine praises Bush for experimenting with "good ideas," but says his "American 2000" program is simply inadequate.

"It is very simple answer to very complex questions," says Levine, a higher education specialist.

Orfield agrees. He says the president has set high goals but has devoted few resources to meeting them.

Although Bush has made substantial efforts in areas such as financial aid and Head Start, several professors believe more money is necessary.

Harold Howe II, a senior lecturer on education who has headed a variety of foundations and national commissions, says Bush should put more into Head Start.

"Good research has shown that it works," says Howe.

Insurgent candidates Brown and Buchanan also receive poor reviews from professors interviewed.

"Brown's record in California was not impressive," says Levine, adding that the candidate was less supportive of the university system there than former governor Ronald Reagan.