Advertisement

Trying to Hold On

"I have not seen an official vote of hers that has been anti-rent control," said Cavellini. "But she has made speeches in the Council, similar to [Mayor Alfred E.] Vellucci, that show signs of wavering. People worry because they see little signs."

In the past, Graham has also faced criticisms that she is willing to compromise her principles, particularly where her family is concerned. In 1985, a series of articles in The Boston herald accused Graham of involvement in the real estate activities of one of her sons and questioned her devotion to tenant's rights.

The attacks centered on the efforts of Graham's son, Carl Graham Jr., to evict tenants from rent-controlled apartments in a six-family building he had recently bought, to make room for his own family and two of his sisters. Although Graham was present at the sale of the house, she denied giving her son anything more than moral support.

In addition, two of her sons were arrested last spring on drug charges, and in 1981 her son Daryl was convicted of deriving a living from prostitution.

"My children don't change my issues," says Graham. "If they did, my oldest son would have me vote down rent control, and I don't believe in that."

Advertisement

She complains that the public and the press treat her differently than they would treat a man facing similar family problems. "They treat women differently," she says, comparing her own negative publicity to that surrounding the drug charges against the son of former vice-presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro.

Nonetheless, the controversy surrounding her children may be one reason why Graham has been hard pressed to hold her City Council seat in recent years. In 1983, she was one of four candidates for City Council to be elected solely from first choice votes on the city's preferential ballot. In the 1985 election, she barely managed to retain her position, coming in last among the nine seats on the Council.

Graham also has some ties to developers. Amongthe contributors to her campaign are Cambridgearchitects as Peter Steffian and Graham Gund, bothof whom have been involved in building low-andmoderate-income housing.

"She's a reasonable person," says Steffian, whocollaborated with Graham on the construction of808 Memorial Drive. "She realizes that to get themost out of what she's looking for, she's got togive something up along the way."

Graham acknowledges that being inside the StateHouse has caused her to alter her methods. In1970, "The Harvard Corporation would not give usone minute of time," she says. "That's why theCommencement was broken up."

But now, she says, "People tend to label you aninsider, which is probably true--only that theinsider has brought those issues, which used to beon the outside, on the inside. I didn't have tojump and scream at Harvard when they came to theCity Council, because I had one ninth of thatpower, to vote them up or vote them down."

She maintains that the change in tactics hasnot reduced her dedication to housing,rent-control, education, and child care.

After her election to the City Council in 1971,Graham says she forced the Cambridge HousingAuthority to manage waiting lists for apartmentsimpartially, and halted a series of evictions.

More recently, Graham was among the creators ofthe civilian Police Review Advisory Board, theonly civilian panel in New England that reviewspolice conduct. Supporters noted that she hascontinued to antagonize the police politicallydespite her sons' tangles with the law.

In the State House, Graham has backed home rulepetitions giving the city power to implement rentcontrol. She also formed a child-care coalitionthat she calls "second to none."

"I have bucked the system inside and out, andI'm still doing that," she says

Advertisement