In response to protests against the decision and charges that Feldstein made the decision unilaterally. Green last month appointed a committee of five faculty members to examine the question of jurisdiction in this and similar cases.

This is the first such review by the department since a committee 10 years ago discussed whether or not to include radical theory on the graduate-level examinations. Green said. The decision on that dispute was to include a question on Marxist economics as a choice on the optional part of the exams.

Rightful Governance

The goal of the present committee, chaired by Lamont University Professor John T. Dunlop, is to determine what the Economics Department's policy should be towards "departmental" courses, which include Social Analysis 10 (formerly Economics 10). Economics 1010 and Economics 2010.

For these courses, "the department sets the curriculum," Green said. "It sounds clear-cut, but what does it mean to set the curriculum?" he added.

"Courses are essentially the private property of the instructors. It's a rule no one would dream of violating, with a few exceptions, and Ec 10 is one of them," said Professor of Economics Stephen A. Marglin '59, one of the committee members.

The other three members are Feldstein. Abbe Professor of Economics Dale W. Jorgenson and Assistant Professor of Economics Suzanne A. Scotchmer.

Although the entire committee has not yet met formally, Dunlop has reportedly spoken with each of the other members in as attempt to sound out their views. The group hopis to have reached a conclusion before the news Economics Department meeting, slated for November 20, Green said.

One section leader who asked not to be identified said Dunlop was chosen specifically because he is a labor economist and has been a labor arbitrator, giving him useful experience is settling difficult disputely.

Dunlop did not return phone calls to his office yesterday

High Hopes

Although it is too late for the sections to be reinstated this year, the protestors hope the committee may recommend reversing the decision next year, although most refuse to speculate on the likelihood this may happen.

In addition to reviewing the decision on the sections, Marglin said the committee must examine other questions, such as what will be the fate of the coursewide radical unit usually taught in the spring, for which Marglin gives two of the four lectures.

Although Feldstein has not yet publicly discussed any intention to keep or erase this unit, Marglin and many other faculty and teaching fellows are concerned that he may end it without warning. "[We] would like [such a desision] not to be a fait accompli, like the radical sections," Marglin said