Advertisement

CHUL Report Asks for CRR Reform

Calls for New Resolution on Rights

Donald J. Simon '75, a member of the CHUL, said yesterday that for "a disciplinary body to have legitimacy for students, there must be half-student, half-faculty representation, and there must be a provision for basic legal rights."

Simon said "I think this is an appropriate time to reform an inappropriate body."

Edward L. Keenan, professor of History and co-master of North House, said yesterday, "I support the section concerning the right to counsel and an open hearing. I'm awaiting the debate on the other questions."

Keenan said, "I think now might be a good time to reconsider the 1970 resolution, which was written in the heat of battle."

James Vorenberg '49, professor of Law and master of Dunster House, said yesterday, "I think it's a mistake to have equal student-faculty representation. There should be a majority of faculty."

Advertisement

Vorenberg also said that "the present safeguards could be improved. I would support the right to legal counsel and open hearings," he said

Advertisement