Amherst, .240 .312 .854
Dartmouth, .236 .297 .812
Brown, .233 .292 .830
Princeton, .202 .252 .793
The following table shows the relative merits of the Harvard nine alone and is arranged like the one above:
Coolidge, 2b. .318 .531 .887
Phillips, 2b, 3b. .294 .490 .717
Winslow, p., c.f. .276 .318 .877
Nichols, p., c.f. .275 .450 .825
Tilden, r.f., l.f. .269 .346 .588
Allen, c., c.f. .250 .270 .915
Smith, 1b. .250 .250 .960
LeMoyne, l.f., r.f., 1b. .244 .377 .906
Baker, s.s. .240 .320 .924
The best fielding nine which could have been picked from all the colleges would have been Winslow, H, p., Allen, H, c., Stewart, Y, 1b., Coolidge, H. 2b., Marble, A, 3b., Baker, H, s. s., Kimball, A, l. f., Stuart, A, c. f., LeMoyne, H, r. f. The best batting nine which could have been formed would have been: A. Moffat, P, p., Souther, Y, c., Hall, D, 1b. Terry, Y, 2b., G. Nettleton, D. 3b., Taylor, A, s. s., Brigham, Y, l.f., Sturart, A, c.f. McKee, Y, r.f.