Advertisement

Football Players Back to Reality

People at this school like to talk about the Harvard bubble. We live with a perpetual haze shrouding our eyes from reality, allowing us only to see a distorted conception of it, one in which every midterm means life or death and thesis deadlines mark the coming of Armageddon.

The illusion permeates every aspect of our lives. Candidates in student elections campaign with an urgency and self-importance befitting a presidential contender. Advocacy groups push for their righteous causes with such vigor and conviction that they might as well be lobbying for legislation in front of Congress.

The only arena seemingly left out of this arrangement of ours is athletics. While the common misconception is that sports aren’t huge here because our teams aren’t good (many of them are), the real reason is that most Harvard students are too immersed in their own great endeavors to care much. But sometimes we’re even able to cover up that reality.

Take last Friday night’s football game against Brown. We were raucous, we were drunk, and by the time the game arrived at its thrilling conclusion, we were really into it. Take away our Crimson Crazies t-shirts, ignore the vast swaths of empty seats (with 6,000 undergrads and 30,000 seats, the math doesn’t add up), and we could have been anybody at any school.

The players of the Harvard football team know that this week, reality sets in again. They might not see their audience hit four digits at a home game for the rest of the season. But I imagine that this brief taste of what they could have experienced every weekend elsewhere must have been nice.

Advertisement

Now they’ll trudge on, in front of their parents, significant others, and not too much more than that. But they’ll do so with their eyes set ahead—not in the stands—looking towards another Ivy League title.

And if they arrive at the Yale Bowl in Week 10 with that goal in sight—or even if they don’t, for that matter—they know we’ll be there, ready to delve into the surreal one more time.

PENN (0-2, 0-0 IVY) AT DARTMOUTH (0-2, 0-0 IVY)

“If you don’t have something nice to say, don’t say anything,” said my fourth grade teacher, Miss O’Leary. “Never kick a man when he’s down,” said various people in a bunch of movies. “Be nice to Dartmouth,” said the sports editor for today’s issue of The Crimson.

Fine, I’ll just talk about Penn—my “Numbers Don’t Lie, But They Can Deceive” pick of the week. Sure, the Quakers are 0-2. But they hung tough with No. 2 Villanova in Week 1, and fell in overtime to Lehigh last week after coming back from a 17-0 deficit—hardly anything to write Penn off in the Ivy League title race over. The Quakers have even more reason to remain optimistic when they look at their schedule. In the next three weeks, they have perennial Ivy League bottom-feeders Dartmouth and Columbia along with Bucknell, a mediocre-at-best Patriot League squad. That should be an easy 3-0, plus two Ivy wins to launch Penn into at least a tie for first in the Ancient Eight, so don’t count out the Quakers just yet.

Prediction: Penn 35, Dartmouth 13

LAFAYETTE (2-1) AT YALE (1-1, 0-1 IVY)

It’s hard to know what to make of either of these teams. Both have trounced Georgetown, but bragging about that would be like me talking smack after dunking on a third grader on a seven-foot hoop.

Lafayette nearly imploded against Penn last weekend and lost to Liberty—No. 24 in the country at the time, but since proven to be fairly overrated. Yale dropped an ugly 14-12 game to Cornell at home, losing on a failed two-point conversion attempt with time expired.

With neither squad making a strong case for victory, I’m going to go with the Bulldogs under the assumption that the team isn’t in the mood to get embarrassed twice in a row at home and quarterback Patrick Witt is going to have a rebound week.

Tags

Advertisement