Alumni who studied Comparative Religion as undergraduates returned to celebrate the 40th year of the concentration this weekend. Festivities included receptions and a series of roundtable discussions that focused on careers and professional life.
The two-day celebration was designed to show undergraduates how the study of religion opened doors to careers in a wide range of industries, such as law, politics, the arts, and academia, according to professor of Comparative Religion Diana L. Eck, who also serves as the co-master of Lowell House. It included a series of roundtable discussions with faculty members and alumni.
“I think this will be a great affirmation of the Humanities in a time when there is so much dispirited whining about the Humanities under siege,” wrote in an email.
Alumni said that they believed that the study of religion had greatly impacted the way they view the world.
“[The study of Comparative Religion] is like a cosmology, in a sense. It is a whole drama set of good and evil, of right and wrong, and of power,” said Eugenie S. Dieck ’77. “If you can understand how someone thinks about those things and respect that, you can have a really meaningful relationship with them.”
Dieck, now a consultant, said that the skills she gained as a comparative religion concentrator have been very useful in both her personal and professional life.
Before the concentration’s inception 40 years ago, students had to propose the study of religion as a special concentration, leaving undergraduates without a formal avenue to learn about the field. Though the cap of ten concentrators has been eliminated, the concentration remains small and tight-knit, according to Eck.
Alumni praised the intimate environment that the concentration fostered.
“It was a comfortable and caring place, in a place that did not have a lot of comfortable and caring places,” said Erik Berg ’89, as he reflected about his experience as an undergraduate.
In this intimate setting, alumni said, undergraduate, graduate, and Divinity School students can freely exchange ideas.
“People say the problem with Harvard is you get taught by graduate students, well Diana Eck was a graduate student when I first had a class with her,” Andrew McCord ’79 said.
—Staff writer Jill E. Steinman can be reached at jill.steinman@thecrimson.com. Follow her on Twitter @jillsteinman.
Read more in Faculty News
New Concentration Was Years in the MakingRecommended Articles
-
Though FAS Slims Down Budget, Work Lies AheadThe Faculty of Arts and Sciences has reduced its deficit to $80 million, signifying a drop that FAS Dean Michael D. Smith credited at yesterday’s Faculty meeting to alumni donations, improvements in the international financial market, and last year’s cost-cutting measures.
-
Dissenting Opinion: Ignorance is Not BlissPolitical and religious discourse have always been intimately bound in America. Today as ever, the United States is an intensely religious place.
-
Reading, 'Rithmetic, and ReligionDue to its role in fostering pluralism, informed political decisions, and tolerance, a comparative religion course does far more to preserve the fundamental tenets of the United States than undermine them.
-
Naddaff To Serve as Next Dean of Harvard Summer SchoolSandra F. Naddaff ’75, a senior lecturer on literature and comparative literature and former Mather House master, will succeed Donald H. Pfister as dean of the Harvard Summer School, the University announced Wednesday.
-
Comparing Gods: The Study of Religion at HarvardIn a small office on the third floor of the Barker Center, students and a few professors congregate to ponder Christianity, Islam, Taosim, and every religion and spiritual practice in between. This is the headquarters for undergraduates studying religion at Harvard, where the approach is comparative and the range of interests is vast.
