It’s one of the highlights on the Harvard Athletic Department’s website. Posters advertising the event claim vast areas of House bulletin boards.
The Harvard men’s and women’s tennis teams will be starting their NCAA tournament runs at the Beren Tennis Center this weekend and the excitement seems to be catching on.
The anticipation is warranted. Participating in NCAA tournaments and earning that opportunity to compete for a national title is what drives collegiate athletes to exert the tremendous effort that they devote to their sports. It’s also what drives college sports fans to hop on the bandwagon of teams in every sport, even if they’ve hardly noticed them throughout the regular season.
Every sport but one that is.
(If a neon sign flashing “football” just went off in your head, you probably know where I’m going with this. Or you need a CAT scan.)
Last week, I pointed out that the Council of Ivy Group Presidents—a terribly inefficient name for a group that puts terribly inefficient restrictions on Ivy athletics—will be meeting next month to debate the league’s approach to sports. I also pointed out some of the ridiculous rules that the group has passed.
I promised myself not to mention the most ridiculous item of them all, the Ivy ban on participation in the I-AA football playoffs. But after being reminded about the madness by the spring football game and the NCAA berths of the two tennis teams, well, here we go again.
This is a list of Harvard teams that are eligible to participate in the postseason:
Baseball, basketball, crew, cross-country, fencing, field hockey, golf, ice hockey, lacrosse, sailing, skiing, soccer, softball, squash, swimming, tennis, track, volleyball, water polo and wrestling.
And the list of squads that are ineligible for the postseason:
Football.
Doesn’t anyone else see anything wrong with this?
And through it all that’s not the frustrating part. Nor is the self-imposed hamstringing of the Ivy football programs by the limits on recruiting, the limits on coaching and the limits on practice time.
The frustrating part is that despite putting Ivy football teams at a severe competitive disadvantage, the teams still find a way to contend on a national level.
It was an embarrassment and a disgrace to sit an undefeated and No. 8 Penn team down without giving them a chance to vie for the national title.
Read more in Sports
Frayer Takes Fifth at Olympic TrialsRecommended Articles
-
A Year to Remember: Crimson Excels in '75Trailing Yale 16 -14 late in the fourth quarter, Crimson quarterback Milt A. Holt '75 led his team onto the
-
Saved by the Bell: X-Treme CautionI never really liked Phil Mushnick. The New York Post scribe puts out a weekly column that lambastes the people
-
Singing The Praises of Unsung AthletesAs ESPN’s College GameDay prepares to turn Penn’s Franklin Field into the center of the college football universe on Saturday,
-
Touch Football and Tennis Tournaments Feature Huge Intramural Sports ProgramAt least two touch football leagues and five tennis tournaments are open to the Class of '52 as part of
-
KING JAMES BIBLE: Presidents Need To Drop the GrudgeWhen will the Ivy presidents admit they’re wrong? This Saturday, No. 13 Harvard will travel to No. 16 Penn for
-
BRAD AS I WANNA BE: Athletes Winners Off Field As WellHarvard, as a school better known for academics than athletics, was doubtless expected to fare quite well in the first