To the editors:
I hope the irony of the statement attributed to Winthrop House Master Paul D. Hanson in The Crimson has not gone unnoticed (News, “Faculty Debates Summers’ Remarks,” Oct. 16). Hanson stated that, “he had experienced first-hand how quickly the door to free and open debate can be closed,” referring to the campus-wide backlash against the signers of the divestment petition in general and, more specifically, to the fact that Frankfurter Professor of Law Alan M. Dershowitz publicly challenged him to a debate, a challenge that he refused. Is Hanson serious? If anyone “closed the door to free and open debate,” it was Hanson himself, upon shamelessly refusing to defend his positions in public in a “free and open debate.” If one has the gall to sign a morally controversial petition sure to offend a significant segment of the University community, public explanation and debate are called for. Attempting to shift the blame onto those that seek debate is, at the very least, dishonest.
Joshua Suskewicz '05
Oct. 16, 2002
Read more in Opinion
We Can Be Both Safe and FreeRecommended Articles
-
Faculty Urge Divestment From IsraelA petition signed by 39 Harvard professors that calls for the University to divest from investment in Israel will be
-
Dershowitz Devises One-Sided DebateTo the editors: That Winthrop House Master Paul Hanson acted courageously in signing the Divestment petition should be as clear
-
Masters Extend Keg Ban to HousesThe House Masters decided unanimously yesterday to ban kegs from the Houses on the weekend of this year’s Harvard-Yale game—an
-
HoCo's Petition Against Keg BanThe co-chairs of the Eliot House Committee delivered a petition yesterday to Dean of the College Harry R. Lewis ’68
-
DEAN NINE OVERCOMES SCRUBS IN LOOSE GAMEThe second University baseball team suffered its second reverse of the season yesterday at Soldiers Field when it went down
