On Thursday, March 15, The Crimson published an article entitled "The Invasian" in the endpaper section of its weekend magazine, Fifteen Minutes. That article should not have run in the form in which it appeared. An article could have been written about minority self-segregation at Harvard that was thoughtful and provocative. This was not that piece.
The Crimson does not shy away from publishing material that is controversial or that some may find offensive. The position taken by Fong regarding self-segregation was a legitimate one. However, The Crimson has standards of argument that it applies to any opinion piece. In making unsupported generalizations, this piece did not meet those standards. Furthermore, while the standards do not change depending on the position taken in an opinion piece, The Crimson should have been more rigorous in their application on an issue known to be sensitive.
The Crimson apologizes for publishing a piece that did not adhere to its standards.
--C. Matthew MacInnis '02, President of The Crimson
Read more in Opinion
You Need To Get AwayRecommended Articles
-
READER REPRESENTATIVEIn the course of two weeks, The Crimson published one editorial, four letters to the editor and two follow-up articles,
-
Vain Attempt to Spike Hubbard's Charges Shown by Lowell's NotesThe official attitude of the University to the charges made in a recent issue of Liberty by W. D. Hubbard
-
APOLOGYAn opinion piece appearing on April 11, entitled "Flipper Joins the Navy," inadvertently contained wording from a short article in
-
Vladimir Horowitz Plays LisztAn Angel re-recording of Liszt's sonata in B minor (COLH 72), carried out by the unbelievably agile fingers and arms
-
Notes From Two Outgoing SeniorsOn a captive audience : By distributing on Class Day, FM should be able to monopolize the senior class readership.
-
Columnists Say Harvard Has Given In To TerrorThe national press has come to Harvard again, bringing more predictions of trouble this year. In September, columnist Joseph Kraft
