The last first-year students handed in their blocking group forms in the basement of the Science Center yesterday in an annual tradition that often marks the end of weeks or months of anxiety and uncertainty.
But this year, when first-years began thinking about who they would block with, one thing was certain: far fewer choices would be available to them than had been to past students, and the spots in their blocking groups would be far more precious.
Previously, first-year students were allowed a maximum of 16 students in their blocking groups, but this year there were no more than eight names on the blue forms that students submitted to indicate their decisions.
Dean of the College Harry R. Lewis '68 says that for the vast majority of first-years, fashioning a blocking group of eight or fewer students was probably little more difficult than putting together a group of 16.
He is confident, he says, that eight is enough, and that the majority of students will be able to piece together cohesive, albeit smaller, groups of friends.
"When people say 'Oh, I have all these friends and it's really important that we be together,' there is some skepticism as to whether that is the case," he says.
But in interviews with The Crimson, many students expressed frustration about the blocking process and the new size restrictions in particular. The switch from 16 to eight, they say, comes at a price.
John, a first-year, says his blocking situation would have been fine if his group had had just one more slot.
Read more in News
Saturday Night Burglary in Currier House Alarms Quad ResidentsRecommended Articles
-
Randomization Creates Larger Blocking GroupsFirst-years will trudge to the Science Center today to submit their blocking forms for the first fully-randomized housing lottery in
-
Once Around the Block: A First-Year FableIn January, they were roommates, talking about how blocking would be the simplest thing in the world. Yesterday morning they
-
Size Does MatterLast week's long-anticipated blocking statistics offer the College a positive-but tentative-sense that some of the adverse effects of randomization predicted
-
Eight is EnoughHow random is random enough? Last week, in an effort to better realize the intent of randomized housing Dean of
-
Blocking Group Size Angers FewOne week after the College announced it would reduce the maximum size of blocking groups from 16 to eight, student
-
Blocking Process About to Begin, With the New Limit of EightEight is enough. That's what proctors will be telling first-year students in their proctor groups as the House blocking process