As a Florida judge mulled over a marathon's worth of arguments about Vice President Al Gore '69's challenge to the state's certified election results, the U.S. Supreme Court continued to deliberate its own strand of election litigation.
The Florida litigants, in a paneled courtroom in Leon County, labored late into the night, focusing their final arguments on the legitimacy of manual recounts, and where they were more reliable than machine tabulations.
The Supreme Court case, Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board Friday, showcased more complex issues of constitutional law. The court agreed to accept the case after Bush appealed a Nov. 21 Florida Supreme Court ruling which held that Florida Secretary of State Katherine L. Harris had abused her discretion in deciding to reject vote totals that some counties wanted to include after Nov. 14 filing deadlines.
Arguing at the Supreme Court Friday for Bush, Theodore Olson asserted that the Florida Supreme Court had effectively upended Florida election law, thereby violating Chapter 3, Section 5 of the United States Code, (3 U.S.C. 5), which states that laws governing elections must be made in advance of the election.
Olson also argued that the Florida Supreme Court overstepped its bounds and acted in a capacity reserved for the Florida legislature. He noted that the Florida Supreme Court made reference to the Florida State Constitution in its decision, but that the state document should have been trumped by Article II of the U.S. Constitution, which states that the legislature should choose how presidential electors are selected.
Gore's attorney, Laurence H. Tribe'62, who is Tyler professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School (HLS), disagreed.
He argued that 3 U.S.C. 5 is merely a guideline, not a statute set in stone, pointing out that a different section of the law contains remedies in the event that 3 U.S.C. 5 is not followed fully.
Tribe also claimed that, though the U.S. Constitution does give the legislature the power to choose electors, the legislature could delegate that power to the judicial branch.
Read more in News
A Different ToneRecommended Articles
-
Florida Supreme Court Hears Both Sides in Election CaseThe future of the presidential election now lies in the hands of the seven members of the Florida Supreme Court.
-
Taking Off the BlindfoldPerhaps we should have known it was too good to be true. Last Friday, the Florida Supreme Court, by a
-
Supreme Court Hears Recount ArgumentsAfter five weeks of legal wrangling, the end is finally near. Lawyers for Vice President Al Gore '69 and Texas
-
LettersDonors Don't Neglect Humanities To the editors: The premise of your editorial (Dec. 4), that humanities and social science departments
-
Deeply Divided Supreme Court Rules for BushA bitterly polarized U.S. Supreme Court effectively ended the presidential hopes of Al Gore '69 last night, reversing a Florida
-
Bittersweet VictoryWith last night's concession by Vice President Al Gore '69, the most tumultuous election of modern times finally came to