To the editors:
I am shocked and dismayed that Jenny E. Heller (Dissent, March 16) would even begin to condone the sort of violent, intimidating protests that have occurred around family planning clinics.
It is not right when a group of anti-abortion individuals, a small minority of the population, scares people out of exercising what is currently a constitutional right. If you don't agree with abortion, that's fine. If you think it's wrong, that's your right. But don't tell me that your right to free speech enables you to harass, intimidate, and tacitly threaten with violence other individuals in society who are attempting to exercise their own rights.
In their righteous zeal, the lunatic fringe of the anti-abortion movement has forgotten their right to protest does not mean they can violently overturn a Supreme Court decision. Many in the prolife movement do understand this, and the staff of The Crimson is right in calling upon them to control the more radical elements of their movement. MICHAEL O'MARY '99-'00 March 16, 1999
Read more in Opinion
Coming Back to FeminismRecommended Articles
-
Not All Abortion Foes ViolentTo the editors: Re Meredith Osborn's "Defending Roe v. Wade" (Op-Ed, March 3): Osborn says that on early Saturday mornings
-
Medical Society Elects Edelin As PresidentThe New England Medical Society last week elected Dr. Kenneth C. Edelin, whose manslaughter conviction for a 1973 abortion was
-
Choosing Freedom of SpeechO n Feb. 2, a jury in Oregon ruled against a group of abortion opponents on the grounds that an
-
Standing Up for Roe V. WadeT oday is National Abortion Providers Day, honoring those who routinely place themselves in the line of fire to make
-
LettersSome Abortion Protestors Overstep Free Speech Bounds To the editors: I am shocked and dismayed that Jenny E. Heller (Dissent,
-
IOP Panel Clashes Over AbortionOpposing sides of the abortion debate looked for common ground but found little at a packed discussion at the ARCO