According to a report heard by the Faculty Council yesterday, Ph.D. dissertation advising should be made more uniform across departments.
The report, termed a "discussion paper" by the nine-person committee that prepared it, suggested that all departments use committees to advise their Ph.D. candidates, rather than one single adviser.
"While advising committees exist in the majority of departments, there are still several departments that retain the single-adviser model," the report reads. "Such a model concentrates considerable power and responsibility in the hands of one individual and is best avoided."
Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS) Christoph J. Wolff, who chaired the Committee on the Structure of Ph.D. Advising, said last night that committee advising would not affect the close relationship that develops between a dissertation writer and a Faculty mentor.
"The single most important relationship--which may actually last a lifetime--is between the principle adviser and the student," he said. "But just in case that relationship goes sour, we want to create a safety net."
That suggestion echoes one made by chemistry graduate student Jason D. Altom in a letter he wrote prior to committing suicide this past summer.
Wolff said that discussions of Ph.D advising began last fall, but the speed of the report was affected by the Altom tragedy.
"[The report] was not in response to it, but the events certainly gave our discussion some urgency," he said.
According to Wolff, the change would protect Faculty members as well, preventing any one person from feeling the full burden of supervising years of work.
He noted the change would be particularly useful for advisers who are frequently "too shy or too reluctant to destroy a student's career by saying he should stop writing and do something else."
The report also suggested increasing the number of Faculty readers who sign a graduate student's Thesis Acceptance Certificate from two to three. The change requires the approval of the full Faculty and will be introduced at a Faculty meeting sometime this spring.
Read more in News
Crimson Grapplers Duel Weak MIT In Final Meet of First Half-SeasonRecommended Articles
-
Faculty Council Approves Dissertation ChangeThe Faculty Council yesterday approved a proposal to raise the number of readers required to sign and approve Graduate School
-
Departments Beef Up Advising in Wake of ReportLast year's Committee on Advising and Counseling issued by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences report has inspired some departments
-
In some fields, advising languishesAfter four frustrating years at Harvard, Joel Pollack '99 decided something had to be done about the College's academic advising
-
Lewis Report Signals ProblemsEarlier this year, Dean of the College Harry R. Lewis '68 released a report on the state of the school
-
An Outside View of a Harvard EducationAre Harvard's senior faculty members outstanding scholars, setting a tone of appropriately cerebral discourse? Or are they insensitive, remote professors,
-
Survey Stresses Student-Faculty ContactLast Monday the University officially released an impressive 133-page self-criticism called the "Report on Advising in Harvard College." Mixed-up world