The effects of solitary confinement substantially damage a prisoner's ability to present a defense in court, a Boston psychiatrist and former Medical School instructor concluded in a study released Monday.
Lawyers of accused terrorist Wadih el-Hage are using the report to claim that el-Hage's prolonged pre-trial solitary confinement is unconstitutional. Attorneys have filed a motion to establish bail or alter prison conditions.
El-Hage, an affiliate of Osama bin Laden, was indicted with three others in 1998 for "conspiracy to murder U.S. personnel and civilians" in connection with the attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He has been held for the past year in solitary confinement in the Manhattan Correctional Facility, awaiting a trial set for Sept. 2000. The government justified the defendant's isolation, saying terrorist attacks can be planned from prison.
But the motion put forth by el-Hage's lawyers claims that solitary confinement alters a prisoner's mental state, infringing on his right to a fair trial by due process.
"We argue that holding [el-Hage] in solitary confinement for an extended period of time is unconstitutional," said one of el-Hage's lawyers, Sam A. Schmidt.
Dr. Stuart E. Grassian, who was a clinical instructor in psychiatry at Harvard until last year, delivered a report based on his four-hour meeting with the defendant. In the report, Grassian said el-Hage's mental state has deteriorated due to the effects of solitary confinement and continued confinement might make his defense impossible.
"When you put a person in a situation with virtually no variety to their environmental stimulation and no meaningful way of occupying themselves, their mental state moves toward stupor and eventually delirium," Grassian said.
Grassian said continued solitary confinement damages a person's capacity to focus on the greater picture.
"The person's mind is in a fog," Grassian said. "If they can focus, they obsess. They can't stop thinking about the sound of a drip."
If the court decides that the prolonged pre-trial solitary confinement does indeed infringe on constitutional rights, the case could set a precedent, el-Hage's lawyers said.
In the last case that dealt with the issue of pre-trial solitary confinement, it had already been proven that the defendant was guilty of committing crimes from within prison. Because the government has no proof that el-Hage would be a genuine security threat from within prison, el-Hage's solitary confinement was unjustified, said Joshua L. Dratel, one of the defending lawyers.
"The government hasn't met its burden of establishing that there is a basis for this," Dratel said.
The government's final response to the defendant's motion is due Dec. 30.
Read more in News
All Proves A-OK at Harvard After Y2KRecommended Articles
-
Yale Professor Arrested For Bail ViolationYale Professor Antonio C. Lasaga was jailed again last Friday after prosecutors alleged he violated the terms of his federal
-
Students Protest Treatment of Alleged SpyStudents and professors who attended a teach-in last night vowed to raise awareness of what many of them called the
-
Expanding Unfair PunishmentWhile Harvard students settle into their Spring term classes, the Massachusetts state legislature will debate a bill that seeks to
-
Protesters Push Prison Reform at State HouseThirty Harvard students and community members gathered in front of the State House yesterday to protest inhumane treatment of prisoners.
-
Out of the Game and Into the Vanguard"At some time in some joint, George Jackson read or heard or did or was done to something that was
-
Atul Gawande Criticizes Supermax PrisonsSupermax prisons, which are designed to hold prisoners in prolonged and strict solitary confinement, are ineffective, expensive, and detrimental to mental health, surgeon and journalist Atul Gawande said during a speech at Harvard Law School yesterday.
