Implicit in the staff's opinion is the endorsement of a disturbing brand of gender and racial determinism--the editors adopt the view that race-based and sex-based characteristics set up virtually impenetrable barriers to understanding and identification, making it impossible for individuals to represent adeptly those of different backgrounds.
Such a dim view of the human capacity for flexibility is both unfortunate and unwarranted. Cultural and ethnic factors certainly do shape the beliefs, attitudes and experiences of all people--even Harvard students--but not to the radical, virtually inescapable extent to which the staff imagines.
The staff's position is also disturbing from a journalistic point of view. In discussing the Undergraduate Council, the opinion becomes mired in questions of proportionality, allowing its ideologically-driven argument to crowd out all further commentary.
In this move, the editors squander an early opportunity to draw attention to the substantive issues the council faces this term, opting instead to trot out an argument which is neither new nor informative.
Read more in Opinion
Defending OurselvesRecommended Articles
-
Ceremony Must GoWhile we empathize with and understand the staff's concern for the Harvard students who participate in ROTC, we believe that
-
Secretary PatronizedThe staff's reflexive political correctness is extremely embarrassing. While Madeleine Albright's appointment as secretary of state is a milestone for
-
Rawlins for PresidentWe support Lamelle Rawlins for president. A dedicated and enthusiastic leader, Rawlins has proven her abilities as both council secretary
-
Keep Status QuoWhile the staff's proposal is a big improvement over the registrar's suggestion, there doesn't appear to be any good reason
-
Abortion Supporters Must Address Fetal DevelopmentUndoubtedly, many opponents of abortion were disappointed to read The Crimson's staff editorial defending abortion rights ("Alliance Brochure is Fallacious,"
-
Locals Matter, TooWhile the staff's concern for undergraduate safety is laudable, the three recent incidents do not represent a newly-arisen targeting of
