Every year, thousands of Harvard students rely on the Office of Career Services (OCS) to help them find summer jobs, internships and especially gainful employment. OCS is also responsible for administering many of the fellowships offered by Harvard and outside institutions.
We're concerned that this valuable resource is not being run efficiently. Recently, a serious mistake on OCS's part came to light. Because of a "human mistake" concerning the due date of the Carnegie fellowship applications, the two students nominated by Harvard were not considered in the competition, which is run by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The due date for the applications was January 15; OCS thought it was a full two months later. Because the applications were submitted in late February, Carnegie decided to reject them due to lateness (without informing Harvard).
OCS, upon learning of the mistake, chose not to inform the two applicants, because "we still had a glimmer of hope our students would be considered," according to Director of OCS William Wright-Swadel. We find this odd, considering that Carnegie had already chosen its finalist and semi-finalist. OCS should have been forthright with the two applicants as soon as it learned of its mistake. In fact, the students did not become aware of the problem until one of them actually called the Carnegie Endowment and was told of the error. The initial oversight was bad enough, but we find it unacceptable that OCS tried to cover its incompetence at the expense of the two applicants.
Regrettably, this error does not come as a complete surprise. While some students undoubtedly are served well by OCS, in our experience we have found that too many repeatedly come away empty-handed--particularly in fields unrelated to business--complaining of ill-informed staff and unhelpful resources. We even know of students who have been given blatantly wrong information by OCS counselors who are supposedly expert in their field. Other than a small selection of yellowing volumes with out-of-date data, OCS has little to offer those who seek work outside the business sector.
According to Wright-Swadel, an internal review of OCS is being conducted to head off such problems in the future. We hope that this mistake leads to a better-managed resource for Harvard students who depend on it to help them make their way in the real world.
Read more in Opinion
Taking Harvard's Name in Vain? Two Sides of the IssueRecommended Articles
-
OCS Late Submitting NomineesHarvard's two nominees for this year's Carnegie fellowships were not considered during the national selection process because the Office of
-
OCS Is Up to ParThe mismanagement of the Carnegie fellowships by OCS is a serious mistake and the handling of that alone points to
-
OCS Bans McKinsey Campus RecruitingThe Office of Career Services (OCS) has barred McKinsey and Company, a pre-eminent consulting group, from this year's on-campus recruiting
-
OCS Policy Change Hinders RecruitersA policy change for on-campus recruiting that requires all companies to conduct first-run interviews on campus has excluded some companies
-
Liberal Arts Graduates To Enjoy Hot EconomyMembers of the Class of 2001, overloaded with job applications and nerve-wracking interviews, have at least one piece of good
-
Gordon Center to Host Career FairCapping off Career Week 1998, the Gordon Track and Tennis Center today will host the 17th Annual Career Forum and