Clark's claims that he is suddenly interested in tolerating CLS viewpoints remind us of a very dirty campaigner's pledge to create a kinder, gentler nation. Rhetoric cannot hide the past. Clark's classroom antics and his qualifications as a corporate law expert should not obscure the fact that he was the wrong choice at the wrong time for the law school.
A majority of law professors and a majority of the selection committee did not voice disapproval at his selection for nothing. Bok's pick was more than puzzling; it was truly pernicious.
Advertisement
Want to keep up with breaking news?
Subscribe to our email newsletter.
Read more in Opinion
Sorry, SUDSRecommended Articles
-
EDITORIAL NOTEBOOK: Zero Tolerance for 'Tolerance'I hate tolerance. Wait! Come back! I'm not going to be offensive. It's not the concept I hate--it's the word.
-
Clark Appointment Made Official; Bok Says Dean Will Be ConciliatoryAt a hastily arranged Law School faculty meeting yesterday, President Bok made it official, naming Professor of Law Robert C.
-
26-Year Law Professor Leaves for ChicagoA 26-year veteran of the Law School faculty, who has criticized the power he says his left-leaning colleagues hold at
-
Freshmen to Decide on Volstead TonightTonight at 7 o'clock in Smith Halls Common Room four members of the Freshman Debating Club will debate the question.
-
Defeating Bush a Key Step for Gay MarriageTo the editors: Adam P. Schneider ’07 made some excellent points in his op-ed on gay marriage ( “Unmarried and
-
1927 DISCUSSION CLUB WILL DEBATE PROHIBITION REPEALThe newly formed Freshman Discussion Club will debate the question of Prohibition in Smith Halls Common Room at 7 o'clock
