Princeton's two all-male eating clubs can exclude women as long as they separate themselves from the university, an administrative judge proposed in the most important ruling to date on an eight-year case that has attracted national attention.
The administrative judge's recommendation on the case of Sally Frank, a Princeton graduate who during her undergraduate years applied to join the three all-male clubs, is non-binding.
During her junior year, in 1979 Frank requested to join the Ivy Club, the Tiger Inn, and the University Cottage Club, which has since begun admitting women. Responding to the clubs' denials to admit her, Frank complained to the Division of Civil Rights.
The Division, which took up Frank's case, has the right to reject the judge's recommendation, in which case New Jersey courts will formulate a binding proposal on the status of the clubs.
Representatives of the clubs said that they are content with the ruling. "All of us are really happy that the courts have affirmed our freedom of association," said President of the Tiger In William T. Russell.
If the Division of Civil Rights agrees to the new recommendation, the two eating clubs not admitting women will no longer be able to participate in such Princeton traditions as meal exchanges with other clubs, and intramural athletics.
The Princeton administration has attempted to remain uninvolved in the controversy. "The university has largely extricated itself from these proceedings by a settlement with Sally Frank last summer," said Thomas H. Wright, general counsel of Princeton.
"Obviously, though, the university disapproves of the admission policies of these clubs. We have stated several times that we would prefer that the clubs be coeducational," he said.
Representatives of the Women's Center at Princeton said the ruling disappointed them.
"We would like to see them go coed because it's hard to present Princeton as a good place for women," said Women's Center member Katherine F. Bowman. "It's personally insulting, as well. There's something humiliating that what we are keeps us from being able to join a club."
Generally, the legal controversy surrounding the clubs has not affected their popularity, Princeton students said. "There has been and will continue to be an interest in all-male clubs," said Laura A. Lazarus of the Daily Princetonian. "They're definitely as popular this year as ever," she said.
Read more in News
Crimson Foils Trinity 17-10; Musliner StarsRecommended Articles
-
Princeton Steps Back Into Frank CaseThe trustees of Princeton University have filed a strongly worded exception to a judge's non-binding recommendation that two all-male eating
-
Princeton Receives Money to Construct 'Dormitory Complex'Princeton has received $500,000 in grants toward $1,250,000 needed for the construction of a new "dormitory complex," Robert F. Goheen,
-
The Gentlemanly Revolt at Princeton FailsProspect St. at night is magic. Fifteen Victorian mansions line the street, glowing gold from their windows. Princeton men in
-
Charges Brought Against Eating ClubsThe Princeton Borough has brought criminal charges against five Princeton University eating club officers and the two clubs of which
-
MUSICIANS AND SINGERS TO INVADE TIGER'S LAIRThe University Glee and Instrumental Clubs leave today for Princeton where they will give the annual dual concert with the
-
Muscial Clubs Will go to PrincetonAbout 135 men will represent the University in the three musical organizations which will go to Princeton for the football