FROM WATCHING the National Collegiate Athletic Association's television commercials during football games, you wouldn't know anything is wrong. "America's energy is mindpower," the ads tout, celebrating the happy and flourishing union of athletics and academics. But the actual state of the NCAA reveals a considerably different picture.
The high-pressure, big money environment of college football has produced a long series of recruiting violations, an atrociously low percentage of athletes who actually receive degrees, a pattern of falsified grade transcripts to allow athletes to maintain eligibility, and a host of other problems. So what was the NCAA's response last week to this growing list of disgraces? The group turned to its Ivy League members--which come closest to joining education and sport in a mutually beneficial alliance--and threw them out of the game's top division.
The Ivies were evicted to give complete control of Division 1-A to the College Football Association, a splinter group including 61 of the nation's most powerful football schools. The top dogs in college football--concerned above all with controlling the game's multi-million-dollar television contract--will no longer be at all accountable to universities that place football in its correct perspective in campus life. With this concession to the professionalism already rampant in the sport, the NCAA will likely deemphasize the regulation and enforcement of recruiting violations and other transgressions.
In practical terms, the removal of the Ivy League schools might not mean much to Harvard; the Ivies' financial arrangements with the NCAA will remain the same, at least in the near future, and the loss in prestige should not make much difference for universities whose reputations seem pretty secure. The worst casualties are these--the game of college football, which slides further away from its professed goals, and the big-time players, who will continue to be treated not as students but as revenue-producing commodities by the men who run the college game.
Though reinstatement for the Ivy League is unlikely, because the schools which voted the schools out would have to vote them back in, the NCAA Division 1-A would be wise to return them to the game's top rank. Student-athletes everywhere deserve better than to see the abandonment of the tradition of sports as a supplement to education--not a substitute for it.
Read more in News
Benefits Plan DiscussedRecommended Articles
-
Presidents Question Ivy Drop in NCAAThe Presidents of all eight Ivy League Colleges said last week that the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA) recent decision
-
NCAA Fun 'n GamesI doubt there has ever been legislation before an NCAA Convention that would be more harmful to more institutions than
-
The NCAA Shame: Why Is HarvardLike the prodigal child grown too big for its britches, the NCAA has turned nasty and slapped its parents in
-
Eleven's Games Won't Be on TVAny possibility that Harvard football games would be televised this fall under the enlarged NCAA football television plan was quashed
-
Harvard Officials Criticize NCAA's Vote To Drop Ivy Football From Div. 1-AHarvard officials yesterday criticized the demotion of the football programs of Harvard and seven other Ivy League schools from Division
-
NCAA Proposals Urge Cost Cuts, Mouthpiece RuleThe National Collegiate Athletic Association Monday urged the adoption of a three-point plan aimed at cutting the costs of intercollegiate