After two-and-a-half years of waiting, Medical Area workers last June got a chance to vote on the issue of union representation--and promptly rejected the bid of District 65, Distributive Workers of America, to represent them in their future dealings with Harvard. The vote followed an intensive publicity campaign by the University, which stressed the view that workers would be better off if District 65, a New York-based union, didn't represent them. And, of course, if Harvard could be let alone to provide them with the good things in life.
Planned paternalism
NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED
Advertisement
Want to keep up with breaking news?
Subscribe to our email newsletter.
MOST READ
-
Harvard Affinity Groups Plan Commencement Celebrations Without University Support
-
Garber Establishes Presidential Priorities Fund, Calls on Alumni to Back Harvard in Fight with Trump
-
HHS Freezes $60 Million in Federal Grants to Harvard in Third Round of Trump Cuts
-
Experts Say Criminal Charges May Be a Bid To Convince HMS Researcher To Leave the U.S. Voluntarily
-
Trump Admin Lawyer Concedes Removal of HMS Professors’ Research from Federal Website Violated First Amendment
Advertisement
From Our Advertisers
Advertisement
Advertisement