After two-and-a-half years of waiting, Medical Area workers last June got a chance to vote on the issue of union representation--and promptly rejected the bid of District 65, Distributive Workers of America, to represent them in their future dealings with Harvard. The vote followed an intensive publicity campaign by the University, which stressed the view that workers would be better off if District 65, a New York-based union, didn't represent them. And, of course, if Harvard could be let alone to provide them with the good things in life.
Planned paternalism
NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED
Advertisement
Want to keep up with breaking news?
Subscribe to our email newsletter.
MOST READ
-
Trump Admin Issues Finding That Harvard Permitted Antisemitism in Violation of Civil Rights Law
-
A Mass Leak Showed the Harvard Law Review Assessed Articles for DEI Values. Some Authors Say That’s Not a Problem.
-
Harvard Appeals Decision Requiring Inclusion of Psych Students in Grad Union for the Second Time
-
Embassy Cited Nonexistent Law To Deny Incoming Harvard Student’s Visa
-
Harvard Custodians Seek To Decertify Their Union Ahead of Contract Negotiations
Advertisement
From Our Advertisers
Advertisement
Advertisement