IT IS ALL too easy to forget that the elderly constitute a minority group, and that mandatory retirement is a vicious tool of discrimination against this group. We agree with the ultimate philosophy of affirmative action--that standards of merit should be the only criteria for employment. But that philosophy should apply to the old as well. Chronological age alone is not a valid criteria for choosing employees.
In an age of overwhelming progress in medicine, improved health care and increased life expectancy, more and more people who reach age 65 are unnecessarily forced to retire. In many cases mandatory retirement leaves severe psychological scars. Old people should not have to fill their last years with make-work and boredom when they are capable of leading active, productive lives.
Therefore we strongly support efforts in Congress to raise the minimum permissable age of mandatory retirement, in hope that mandatory retirement will be eliminated altogether. American society is badly in need of reforms to provide equal opportunity for women and minorities. But the need for broad reform should not be grounds for continued discrimination against the elderly. It is unclear whether the passage of the bill now in Congress will cripple attempts to implement reforms favoring opportunities for women and minorities, but it is clear that a continuation of mandatory retirement will limit the opportunities of the nation's elderly.
Read more in News
HOW THEY GOT TO...Recommended Articles
-
Students' Sentence Light But FairT his past Thursday, Stephen V. David and William A. Blankenship, two former members of the class of 1996 and
-
RetirementT HE MANDATORY retirement legislation currently winding its easy way through Congress involves far more difficult questions than one would
-
Legislation May Affect Tenure SystemCollege faculty members will almost certainly not be exempted from Congressional legislation--bogged down in a Senate-House conference committee since September--which
-
Too Many or Too Few Professors in the '90s?If everything goes as scheduled, 1994 could be a bad year for Harvard's junior professors. A federal law prohibiting a
-
Schools Consider Faculty AgingFew jobs promise a lifetime term: a seat on the Supreme Court, the papal office and membership on the Harvard
-
Seniority Incentives: A Golden OpportunityThis January, a law went into effect making mandatory retirement ages illegal. This ruling means that senior tenured faculty may