To the Editors of The Crimson:
Scott Kaufer's article on the proposed rules for honors contained an inaccurate statement, attributed to "a source close to the Ad Board." It is not true that the Committee recommended that a departmental nomination be required for CLGS, and that this proposal was dropped "quite amicably" after objection by members of the Ad Board. The question of departmental recommendation was discussed and rejected by the Committee. Anthony Arlotto Member, Committee on Honors
Advertisement
Want to keep up with breaking news?
Subscribe to our email newsletter.
Read more in News
In Defense of South-WesternRecommended Articles
-
CUE Approves Plan to Change Honors Examination ProcessThe Committee on Undergraduate Education (CUE) voted Wednesday to recommend changing the requirements for graduating with a general honors--cum laude
-
KAUFER'S REPLYI reported exactly what the source told me: that before the report came to the full Ad Board, several Ad
-
Gov's Thesis Policy DismayingTo the Editors of The Crimson: As a senior honors Government concentrator, I find myself caught between pleasant memories of
-
Honorable MentionWith the desirability for honors increasing as the criteria of the graduate schools become more selective, the present arbitrary standards
-
Over-ConcentrationDean Ford suggested recently that pressures in the departmental Honors system which seem to push students toward "over-concentration" could be
-
YALE'S NEW "GENERALS" LIKE HARVARD'S EXAMS IN BASIC PRINCIPLESYale's adoption of a general examination system, announced last Sunday to the general press, represents the culmination of several years
