It's a lot of running to do for naught.
The Harvard cross-country team ended its season two weeks ago by qualifying for the NCAA finals. Although the Crimson finished with a less-than-impressive 3-9 record, it was ranked fourth in New England and managed to place fourteenth in the NCAA's qualifying meet, thus earning the right to compete in the national finals.
In a surprise move, however, the Crimson harriers were denied permission to participate in the national competition. The Harvard Athletic Department last week cited a tight athletic budget as the main reason for the refusal. But for athletes and coaches alike, the decision has raised questions about priorities in Harvard athletics.
Crimson Captain Bill Okerman says he is disappointed with the decision. "In the first place, it's discouraging to an athlete when they (the athletic administration) say you can't run in a race. The idea of athletics is to get athletes to compete," Okerman said last night.
"But it's harder to tell an athlete he can't go to a final championship that he's qualified for," Okerman, a senior, said. "That's harder than telling him he's not good enough to qualify to begin with."
Okerman said he doesn't believe Harvard lacks the money to back the team. "If we had a better team, we would have gone. The money could have, and should have, been found. What it really boiled down to was that Harvard's qualifying standards were more stringent than the NCAA's qualifying standards," he added.
Without the Athletic Department's permission, even outside financial assistance was out of the question, Okerman said. "They wouldn't even allow our supporters to donate money. We had the support of friends, but not the athletic office."
Three-Year Policy
Athletic Director Robert Watson was unavailable for comment yesterday, but Assistant Director Baaron R. Pittenger said the department decision can be explained in simple terms. "In the last three years, the financial situation for athletics has tightened," Pittenger said.
"we made it clear that mere qualification for NCAA competition did not mean that we would send any team or individual for such competition," he added.
"Now, even if a team does qualify for national competition," Pittenger said, "that team must show a reasonable expectation for doing well."
"Obviously, a 3-9 season's record, seventh in the heptagonals, and fourteenth in the qualifying meet, does not give us reason to expect a productive showing," Pittenger said.
"The team qualified through a mere quirk in the system."
Argued Strongly
Asked for his reaction last night, Harvard cross-country Coach Bill McCurdy seemed sympathetic with both sides.
Read more in Sports
ON DECK