To the Editors of the Crimson:
On October 20, the Crimson ran a story concerning the College's new Director of Admissions, John P. Reardon '60. In that article you quote Mr. Reardon as saying that, because of the planned cutback in male admissions, the categories of "alumni sons and the disadvantaged" would have to be reduced.
As a black student here I am concerned with the matter of black admissions. Although the term "disadvantaged" does not necessarily imply "black" one can. I think, based on empirical evidence, make the assumption that a substantial number of students and potential applicants will fall into both categories.
I will not accuse the University in general or Mr. Reardon in particular of racism in this matter. To do so would be entirely premature and groundless. I merely wish to raise a valid question about a matter of admissions policy that could lead to misunderstanding and animosity in the future. Christopher H. Foreman '74
