To the Editors of the CRIMSON:
As participants in Friday's demonstration, we would like to point out an inaccuracy in the CRIMSON article of Saturday, February 24. According to the article the demonstration was intended to protest the University's involvement with the war in Vietnam. However, this purpose was only one of three. The other two points were immediate withdrawal of troops from Vietnam, and for an end to the draft for an unjust war. These points were important because they focused the demonstration not only on the University, but also on other war issues which directly affect students. The demonstration, the result of a month of discussions and planning, is not the end of a limited and local attempt to end recruitment, but one step in a continuing anti-war effort. Beth Harvey '71 Katha Pollitt '71 Naomi Schapiro '71
Read more in News
Marxist TripeRecommended Articles
-
Typical Member of Class of 1971 Is Affluent White Male, Report SaysThe average member of the Class of 1971 is a married white male attorney who lives in a metropolitan area
-
An Unreasonable PunishmentThe Faculty voted last night to place 71 students on probation until June for their involvement in the Dow demonstration.
-
SDS ON ROTCTo the Editors of the CRIMSON: Regarding the SDS letter against ROTC being on campus in the October 21 edition
-
No HeadlineN. H. SOCIETY. - Regular meeting this evening. Feb. 17th, at 7.30 p.m. in Mass, 2. "Practical Demonstration of the
-
Paine Cliffies Hold PanelA panel discussion run by Cliffies who sat in at Paine Hall was held at Radcliffe yesterday. The 19 girls
