WASHINGTON, D.C., Dec. 18 -- The Constitution protects private telephone conversations--even those made from a public booth--from unauthorized government snooping, the Supreme Court ruled today.
However, law enforcement agents may eavesdrop and use what they hear as evidence if the electronic surveillance is limited and is conducted with a judge's permission, the court also held.
With the 7-1 decision, by Justice Potter Stewart, the court abandoned its "trespass" doctrine--the view that privacy is not violated unless there is a physical trespass.
In other words, as Stewart put it: "What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected."
Read more in News
Memorial Church Congregants Endow Gomes Lecture
