Cambridge's anti-jaywalking law, which goes into effect next month, is based on the false proposition that the speedy movement of traffic is what everyone wants. Traffic Commissioner Rudolph's plan will probably move more automobiles through the Square more quickly than at present but at the expense of one of Cambridge's most endearing traditions: the freedom to walk where one likes. Policemen will be able to ticket pedestrians who venture outside crosswalks, which despite luminous paint are now virtually invisible. Hurried motorists will be able to run down errant pedestrians and worry less about paying damages.
Till the end of May, Cambridge will remain one of the last strongholds of the human being in his constant struggle against the automobile. It should continue to be one.
Read more in News
Leverett WinsRecommended Articles
-
A Countdown to SafetyThe Crimson lauds the recent addition of countdown crossing signals to Harvard Square. These signals, which are currently pending approval
-
Dodging Traffic: Pedestrian Safety in the SquareIt is hardly news to Brenda Wynne, a waitress at Charlie's Kitchen, that the corner right outside of the Eliot
-
Diversions of a Head-y WeekendI F you were looking for a party last weekend, you weren't on campus. As is tradition for the Head
-
Is Director Rudolph Really in a Jam?O N THE FLOOR of the Cambridge City Council's chambers, there is a massive table where City department heads sit
-
Square Crossing Is DangerousIt finally has happened. Pedestrians in Harvard Square are fed up and fighting back at the intersection of John F.
-
City May Delay Enforcement Of Jaywalking LawCambridge may wait as long as a year before trying to enforce the antijaywalking law that went into effect this
