The articles in this eleventh CRIMSON Commencement Supplement attempt to answer some questions essential to an understanding of the undergraduate and the College: What are the religious and political opinions of Harvard undergraduates? What transitions in attitudes have undergraduates experienced? What factors cause these changes and, more specifically, what effect does Harvard exert in molding the student's beliefs?
Each undergraduate here has probably formulated some rough notions about the influences of the college; in general, one would expect the atmosphere of the University to exert a "liberalizing" or more questioning attitude toward the legacy of opinion that the student possesses when he arrives in Cambridge. But we have tried to chart these effects on different groups among the undergraduates and to isolate the causes more accurately.
Results indicate, in summary, that although Harvard's influence leads to re-examination of beliefs it rarely induces a reversal of beliefs, that the period of secondary school education is the one in which occur most significant transitions from family tradition. The College thus attracts the questioning student, it does not produce him.
Features on the attitudes of undergraduate Catholics, Protestants, and Jews, agnostics and atheists are included, as well as an article on Radcliffe students and one on the College political spectrum. Each of the religious groups has been covered by a member of the faith discussed, in order to provide a more understanding approach. Any writer's editorial statements do not necessarily reflect CRIMSON policy.
Findings of the features are based on interviews with local religious leaders and the results of a random-sample poll (text on pages S-7 and S-8) distributed to 400 Harvard and Radcliffe undergraduates. Three hundred and ten polls were returned, a response of 78 per cent.
We are especially grateful to David Riesman '31, Henry Ford II Professor of Social Sciences, who gave valuable advice on the random-sample poll and to the local religious leaders and faculty members who discussed with us the issues involved. Editors for this supplement are Richard N. Levy '59, John E. McNees '60, and Charles S. Maier '60, David Horvitz '60 did the photographic work and William E. Schroeder '60 tabulated and correlated the questionnaire.
Copyright June 11, 1959, by the Harvard Crimson
Read more in News
Tenant TalkRecommended Articles
-
Sports Headline Sacrificed Sensitivity in the Name of WitI was deeply offended by a sports headline on Tuesday, October 3, reading "W. Soccer Crucifies Holy Cross, 3-1." In
-
Harvard--Our Big Brother?Imagine: You arrive at Harvard for the first time. Your parents help you lug your bags up four flights of
-
Religion and Politics at HarvardSince most students returning to Cambridge were not here at graduation time last Spring, the articles on this and the
-
MissionaryTo the Editors of The Crimson: John P. Thompson's piece "Spiritual Soliciation" (April 15, 1986) struck home. Being approached by
-
TO DISCUSS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLESThere are men in College who give serious thought to religious principles and men who do not. Those who do
-
Yale Wins Either WayH arvard is a community in which acceptance of others is heavily stressed; yet, fringe groups such as Peninsula do